Talk:Transfer pricing/Archives/2017

Seeking objections

Fellow Earthlings:

I believe this page needs a overhaul and that I'm in a good position to do it. There's some good stuff in here, but there are a number of issues (in no order) that obscure it:

1. Much of the information is dated: The last four years or so have seen an unprecedented flurry of activity in this area (see the base erosion and profit-shifting (BEPS) project and country-by-country (CbC) reporting if you aren't familiar) but other than the handful I've added, there are no references to major recent developments.

2. There are a number of subtle technical errors, some of which I've already fixed: It would take some time to explain these, and so I offer to provide examples and explanations upon request.

3. Some sections drown the reader in excessive and distracting detail: The whole "economic theory" section isn't very useful and if people are seeking guidance on how to perform a comparability analysis in a sec. 6662 study, they should refer to the applicable laws or regulations.

4. The sequence isn't ideal: The best example is the "profit allocation" section near the top. This is about alternative approaches to intra-group profit allocation that could replace transfer pricing. I don't think it makes sense to begin a page about a regulatory framework by talking about what could replace it.

5. There many unsourced statements: Res ipsa loquitur.

If there are no protests, I will begin making the page more accurate, concise, and up-to-date. However, I will make every effort to preserve as much material as I can. As I said, there's some good stuff in there.

I say this only for the purpose of disclosure and to allow people to fully evaluate my proposals: I worked as a transfer pricing consultant for about eight years, I focused on tax in law school, and my current job is to write about transfer pricing for a major trade periodical (Tax Notes / Worldwide Tax Daily) (http://www.taxnotes.com/document-list/contributors-authors/finley-ryan?subscribed=1) . I'm not claiming any kind of special authority, but I think I can make a valuable contribution by updating and reorganizing this page.

I would be more than happy to discuss these things should anyone wish to do so.

Ryanmsfinley (talk) 22:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Ryanmsfinley (talk) 22:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Very Well, Then

I shall proceed. If anyone would like to get into the details of what I'm doing and why, I'll be monitoring this page closely.

Ryanmsfinley (talk) 17:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

I'll try to pitch in as well. Initial thoughts are that it looks a bit US centric and it needs more of an overarching plan of what it's trying to convey. I'll post up proposed changes here once I've had a chance to get my head around what's already in the article. User39118114 (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Appeal for "Subject-Matter Expert" Status and Citation to Self-Published Article

I wanted to disclose that I cited to a self-published article based on the guidelines for subject-matter experts and citations to self-published sources. My name is Ryan Finley and I'm responsible for the most of the transfer pricing coverage for Worldwide Tax Daily at Tax Analysts, a well-respected tax law news source. I've been working on revamping the page in spurts over the last few months.

There was a particular point made in the previous version that I wrote about a couple of months back. I cited my article because it's honestly the most relevant article I know of, and I don't see any real way the citation could produce any personal benefit. I tried to be discreet, including by leaving the author field blank. I will offer no protest if someone wants to replace it with a suitable alternative (or anything else, honestly).

The citation is currently at footnote 6, immediately following "although their rules can differ on some important details":

"The Year in Review: The Year of the Many Arm's-Length Standards". 85 Tax Notes Int'l 25 (2017-01-02). Tax Analysts. Retrieved 2017-02-27.

Ryanmsfinley (talk) 01:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Transfer pricing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100426064925/http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00006662----000-.html to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00006662----000-.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)