 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Untitled edit
This sentence "Initial reports have speculated that the toll would be (2007 dollars) AU$3.70. This toll will be more than twice the $2.00 toll as promised by Mr Newman when the tunnel is eventually open." appears inconsistent. How is $3.70 more than twice $2.00?--121.45.247.205 (talk) 05:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Removed the sentance "This massive blowout calls into question all of Mr Newman's pre-election costings." as it does not conform to neutrality rules. JadeSin (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:05, 23 March 2010 (UTC).
Plan or idea? edit
The article paints TransApex as part of a urban infrastructure plan. However there are few if any planning documents for the city or region which called for five road tunnels to be built preceding its development. A better way to characterise the project is as a political initiative as explained on page 11 of the book A climate for growth. I propose that the use of the word 'plan' to describe the project as a whole be replaced by the word 'initiative'. - Shiftchange (talk) 07:42, 27 October 2013 (UTC)