 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Contested deletion edit
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... The duplication detector only fires for a few full sentences, I'm working on the content and am therefore necessarily making it unique. Yes, I used the UCSC pages as a source for this material, but that is the only source currently. As track hubs become more widely used, it's useful to have this material on WP. --Dan Bolser (talk) 14:22, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Looking at the notice more closely I read: "This criterion applies only in unequivocal cases, where there is no free-content material on the page worth saving and no later edits requiring attribution", which is clearly not the case here. The copyvios report looks OK to me (especially at this stage). --Dan Bolser (talk) 14:25, 18 March 2016 (UTC)