Talk:Tourism in Malta/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Lemurbaby in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk) 15:27, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Comments

edit
  1. A good GA-level article - congratulations and thank you for the hard work put into it. In the run-up to FA, I would suggest providing additional information on Maltese attractions in particular, and diversifying the references beyond the Maltese government websites. -- Lemurbaby (talk) 15:27, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply