Talk:Top-of-mind awareness
Latest comment: 8 years ago by BronHiggs in topic Is Separate Page Really Necessary?
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Widely used
editAbout the reliable sources. Take any source on a topic of advertisement and persuasion e.g. Persuasion. Reception and Responsibility. Eleventh Edition. By Charles U. Larson. or google. You will see that this acronym is widely used.
- Yes. Google TOMA gives:
- TOMA - Tennessee Oil Marketers Association
- Texas Osteopathic Medical Association
- TOMA Foundation for Burned Children
- The first relevant link is in page 2: [1]. But - if you have a reliable reference, please put it into the article - that's where it belongs! --Alvestrand 10:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Is Separate Page Really Necessary?
editI'm struggling to understand why top-of-mind awareness needs its own page. The concept is covered in a number of other pages e.g. Consumer Behaviour, Brand Awareness etc. Unless it is part of a dictionary of terms, there is no value to be gained by having a separate page for this concept. BronHiggs (talk) 02:56, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message
edit | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |