Talk:Tiny Thompson/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Peanut4 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

A really good read, well-written and well-referenced. I'm not sure how easy it will be to expand given how long ago he played, nor find an image, but good luck with future expansion. Peanut4 (talk) 15:33, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply