Talk:Tickle Cock Bridge/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Pyrotec in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
Interestingly, I watched the "Kevin McCloud and the Big Town Plan" broadcasts and I don't particularly "remember" the "old structure (without its roof)" in your first photograph. The second picture is a bit more familiar; but the one I do remember is the one "with the roof one" shown in ref 1. I think you aught to retitle that first picture to make it clear that the roof has gone; and, even better, show a picture with the roof on (if there is one to hand).
Other than that, there is not much more I can say. You have a GA, congratulations on acheiving the standard. Pyrotec (talk) 19:57, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply