Talk:Thumbelina/GA1
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Could use some more fleshing out gaps & recent publications
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- Pretty good. Could use some tightening up.
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- I wonder about the Mary Howitt image
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I do believe we have a solid, interesting, encyclopedic-quality article on Thumbelina. I was surprised to see how enduring a character she has become and as such, there's actually a fair bit of room for expansion. But the basics have been covered, and then some. Kudos for the good work of all who contributed. It was fun to review.--Scott Free (talk) 19:05, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I intend to incorporate this into the article soon. --Edge3 (talk) 02:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Great - it can only make it gooder - thanks for help with the film refs. --Scott Free (talk) 18:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC)