Talk:Three Horses Beer/GA1

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Coemgenus in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 11:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply


Checklist

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit

I'll get started on this one today. --Coemgenus (talk) 11:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is a well-written article, not much to quibble with.

Lede
  • "Star Breweries also produces THB Fresh, a shandy (locally called panaché), with less than 1% alcohol, THB Special (6.2% alcohol), and THB Lite, a low alcohol beer (1%)." This sentence has some confusing commas. I'd suggest using semi-colons or more parentheses.
Production
  • "...a type of mushroom is added..." That's an interesting detail. Do you know which kind of mushroom?
  • Unfortunately, the source material doesn't specify. I'd like to know too! - Lemurbaby (talk) 06:04, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • That's too bad. It will have to remain a mystery! --Coemgenus (talk) 12:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Images
  • File:THB.JPG concerns me. The license says it's the uploader's own work, but it looks a lot like the company's advertising. Do you know any more about it?
  • Agreed, I'm doubtful it's original work. I've replaced the image. - Lemurbaby (talk) 06:04, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
References
  • Footnotes 20 and 22 are deadlinks.
  • Yes, it doesn't appear there are any active versions of these pages anymore, though they're available cached. Otherwise I would provide updated links. - Lemurbaby (talk) 06:04, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • The best thing to do in that case is to change the "url=" field to "archive-url=" and replaced the dead link with the address for the archived version. --Coemgenus (talk) 12:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply