| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thonny article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Notable?
editIf one discards the sources written by the developer, there's not much left to discuss TEDickey (talk) 10:34, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
I'm the developer. What are the requirements for notability? Among references there are 4 reviews written by people not connected to the development team (I found the reviews by web search). Is this not enough? Aivarannamaa (talk) 11:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
There's some continuing coverage, developer.com Best Python IDEs 2021 28 August 2021
Neutrality
edit"It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view" -- what are the specific complaints here? Aivarannamaa (talk) 11:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Most of the given sources aren't useful for establishing notability. The article should focus on that, rather than the documentation and website-links TEDickey (talk) 00:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- I removed two less relevant references and I think the remaining ones are useful for article readers.Aivarannamaa (talk) 07:08, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- The "Reception" section looks promotional (and with the topic essentially just a list of things, there's not much to read...) TEDickey (talk) 01:54, 31 October 2018 (UTC)