Talk:Thermoresponsive polymers in chromatography

This article was once a section of the article temperature-responsive polymer. However, it was inappropriate in length and detail. Therefore, it was moved into a separate article. This article may not meet the notability critera of the Wikipedia because it is mainly based on primary sources. Please carefully review the writing style and references of the article. My opinion is the following:

Section: Major breakthroughs and novel techiques in seperation chemistry

The title is inappropriate because it is judgemental. Who says that the discussed methods were major breakthroughs? For such a statement one needs several references that make clear that it is the consesus of the scientific community. In general, I feel that that the whole section “major breakthroughs …” does not meet the notability guidelines of wikipedia because primary sources are discussed in inappropriate great detail. Primary sources may well be used for referencing particular examples. However, the section lacks secondary sources such as scientific review articles or books which are necessary to meet the “significant coverage”-guideline.

It did not want to delete anything without broader consent.

Flitzer707 (talk) 14:58, 6 December 2012 (UTC)