Talk:The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt/GA2

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Cognissonance in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 13:43, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply


  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    "The writing was infused with real-life aspects" - this is a bit vague in the lead, can you clarify at all?
    "some of which were later patched" - this needs a wikilink or explanation; non-gamers might not understand the terminology
    "(one steel and one silver)" - I'm not sure if this is worth mentioning, but up to you
    I went into more detail about their function. Cognissonance (talk) 10:18, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
    "(who pay in crowns)" - the lead says you earn "gold". Is 'crowns' the type of gold? I'm not sure if this bracketed information is worth mentioning in any case
    You're right, there's no need to go into all of the monetary units. Cognissonance (talk) 10:18, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
    "Gies from Polygon" - have I missed something? Why are we only using his surname?
    'people of color' could be wikilinked to Person of color
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?  
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?  
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?  
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?  
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: As I completed the peer review I'm already fairly familiar with this article. Very close to passing once minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 01:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
    @Freikorp:   Done Cognissonance (talk) 10:29, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
    Passing. Well done. :) Freikorp (talk) 11:18, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
    Thanks Freikorp for taking the review. Thank you Darkwarriorblake (plot, setting) and AdrianGamer (gameplay, post-release) for helping me with the article in June. It's a good article now because of you. Cognissonance (talk) 12:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply