Talk:The Sopranos/GA2
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Cirt in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
Good article nomination on hold edit
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of September 3, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Written in clear and understandable wording.
- 2. Factually accurate?: The majority of the article is cited very well, I went in a added some {{fact}} tags,
these should be addressed before the GA Hold is up. - 3. Broad in coverage?: Indeed.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Appears to be written in a neutral manner.
- 5. Article stability? A bit of changes through the edit history as the article has been worked on a bit, however no evidence of any significant conflicts going back a couple months. Keep an eye on those IP edits. No major conflicts evident upon inspection of talk page either.
- 6. Images?: 4 fair-use images, fair use rationale provided on image pages.
Please go through and change the fair-use rationale style to a box like this one Image:Sopranosposters2.jpg, for the other three fair-use images Image:Sopranos6.jpg, Image:Sopranos titlescreen.png, and Image:SopranosVanityFair.jpg.This image Image:Sopranos-ontheset.jpg should be moved to Wikimedia Commons.
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. Cirt (talk) 02:01, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
GA Passed edit
Excellent work by Thebogusman (talk · contribs), thanks for addressing my above points. Cirt (talk) 03:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC)