Talk:The Sky Is Pink/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Raymie (talk · contribs) 04:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

This article is nearly there, but it could use a bit of work in the lead section and in avoiding long direct quotes.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I wonder if the lead is a little long, particularly the second paragraph.

• The lead reflects the body of the article which is huge. So I think the lead is justified and I have written several articles with big leads. Perhaps, I should break the second paragraph into two, what's say?Krish | Talk To Me 14:38, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   There are some long quotes where paraphrasing might prove useful, such as in the "Development" subsection and to a lesser extent in "Themes and analysis". I really want to see trimming down of the direct quotes in "Development" especially. Have you considered using quote boxes for important quotes?

• I have paraphrased mostof the quotes. Is is okay now?.Krish | Talk To Me 14:38, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

3. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Most contributions have been by the nominator and as part of a GOCE copy edit.

4. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Appropriate captions in use. The only non-free image is the movie poster, which has an FUR.

5. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Giving this 7 days to look at trimming down the lead and eliminating lengthy quotes in the aforementioned sections.

Pinging nominator Krish!. Raymie (t • c) 05:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

• All done, Raymie. Thank you for your review. Is there something else?Krish | Talk To Me 14:38, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

• @Krish: Not that I saw. I did see a couple grammar items to clean up, but that's it. Raymie (t • c) 18:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
• @Krish!: (oops!) I am passing this for GA. Raymie (t • c) 22:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)