Talk:The Scene That Celebrates Itself
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merge
 | The contents of the The Scene That Celebrates Itself page were merged into Shoegazing#The Scene That Celebrates Itself on 19 September 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Scene That Celebrates Itself redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 31 December 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in London may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Merge edit
The phrase, "the scene that celebrates itself", is just a journalistic reference to the Shoegazing genre. There's no reason for it to have its own article. -- Hux 16:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Then it's "the article that celebrates itself." Sorry, couldn't resist. But you're right, it may well be best to incorporate the contents into the Shoegazing article. Monkey Bounce (talk) 23:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Surely pre-Parklife, Blur were closely associated with "the scene that celebrates itself" but were never by any stretch of the imagination shoegazers? 84.70.34.102 (talk) 21:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Let me quote wikipedia itself: "Blur's debut album Leisure (1991) incorporated the sounds of Madchester and shoe gazing" --151.47.62.5 (talk) 10:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Deletion edit
Utter shite. How is this an article. I don't know how to nominate it but please delete the fucker. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.69.114.41 (talk) 05:28, 6 December 2008
- Have to agree! 203.206.182.151 (talk) 06:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Also agree, I lived and went to gigs at this time, and this was just a music press phrase that meant nothing and had no wider social relevance. Do all passing journo quotes at the lower end of the press spectrum get an article? Once deletion proposals have been discussed, do they stay closed? It was 9 years ago Chwyatt (talk) 08:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)