Talk:The Return (Kamaal Williams album)/GA1
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Zmbro in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zmbro (talk · contribs) 17:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey there! I know almost nothing about Kamaal Williams, but I'm bored and this looks like an interesting read so I'll review it for ya! – zmbro (talk) 17:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking the time. 😃 웃OO 17:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
edit- Infobox looks good, but question. Do we have any recording dates/ranges or studio(s) available?
- ", under his Black Focus Records." → ", under his Black Focus Records label."
- Link music videos
Background and development
edit- Is there a specific reason the duo decided to break up?
- "This style was labeled as "jazz fusion"" labeled by whom?
- Is there a reason Williams chose these specific musicians to play on the record? Or were they just studio ones?
- None specified. 웃OO 22:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Asked this in the previous section but do we have any sourced recording dates/ranges or studios available? If not that's fine I'm just wondering.
- None available. 웃OO 22:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Composition
edit- I'm noticing this section is very quote-heavy. I would try to paraphrase a little bit more.
Release and promotion
edit- I'm assuming the tour went ahead as scheduled? Right now it only says it was announced.
- They are just announcements. I don't recall finding a whole lot where they indeed performed at such places. 웃OO 22:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Reception
edit- The lead mentions a summary of reception, stating "some praising the re-creation of jazz-funk sounds of the 1970s, while others questioned the length of certain songs" but that's not present here. I'd make it known in this section as well.
- Italicize Pitchfork
- Also noticing this section to be very quote-heavy. I would check out WP:RECEPTION to assist with paraphrasing.
- I'd add a summary to the start of accolades, such as "The Return appeared on numerous year-end lists in 2018." something like that
- Just my personal preference, but I would put the refs into their own unsortable col. You don't have to just my preference
Track listing
edit- Are writers available?
- None specified. 웃OO 22:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Interesting. Don't see that often but I guess it happens. – zmbro (talk) 19:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Total length?
Personnel
edit- Looks good
Charts
edit- I'd make the table sortable
References
edit- Copyvio detector is showing a couple violations over 40%. As I stated earlier, I would paraphrase a bit more, as certain sections seem very quote-heavy.
- Looks much better. Now it's showing less than 40%, ideally you'd want it lower, but it's definitely much better than before. – zmbro (talk) 19:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- I would use the actual titles instead of "AllMusic review", "Pitchfork review", etc.
- I changed them all, though "Kamaal Williams - The Return" isn't really that spectacular either. 웃OO 22:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Archive ref 8, 21, and 26
- Access date for ref 15?
- Ref 22 is via wayback machine so I'd make sure that url is present.
- Are there available dates for refs 8, 18, 21, 27–32?
- Ref 33: is there a url or other info?
- there used to be, but it wasn't the wire url. 웃OO 22:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Feel like there needs to be more info than just the title and website sadly. Is there a date/access date or other non-web info available? – zmbro (talk) 19:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Is Tiny Mix Tapes an RS?
- [1] this consensus says it should be. 웃OO 22:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Cool beans. I'd never seen it before so just wanted to make sure. – zmbro (talk) 19:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Another question when further reviewing. Is "Piccadilly Records" supposed to italicized? Seeing it that way in the table and ref but in the text it's not. – zmbro (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Final thoughts
editOverall looks good. Gotta be less quote-heavy in some sections and got a few other things to resolve but should be a GA in no time. For now on hold. – zmbro (talk) 17:50, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- I should have resolved alot of the issues here. I hope the paraphrasing is ok, the rest of the quotes I couldn't do, at least not at the moment. 웃OO 22:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- I just addressed those last two issues. 웃OO 23:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Looks good. Happy to ✓ Pass – zmbro (talk) 18:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- I just addressed those last two issues. 웃OO 23:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)