Talk:The National Conference Center/GA2

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Whiteguru in topic GA Reassessment

GA Reassessment edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessment will follow the same sections of the Article.   Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 01:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no opposition or improvements made; Matters raised in the reassessment were not addressed. These matters will remain valid until the next GA Review, whereupon they must be addressed first. --Whiteguru (talk) 01:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment


Observations edit

   HTML document size: 67 kB
   Prose size (including all HTML code): 4614 B
   References (including all HTML code): 19 kB
   Wiki text: 8067 B
   Prose size (text only): 2959 B (470 words) "readable prose size"
   References (text only): 3943 B
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  • From its opening in 1974 until May 2014, it was run by ARAMARK Harrison Lodging, a management services company.[9] In May 2014, NCC EE, LLC became the new management services group. [according to whom?]
  • Reference 1 is a dead link, available on Archive.org
  • Reference 3 is a dead link, available on Archive.org; this is User generated content, a primary source;
  • Reference 5 is User generated content, a primary source;
  • Reference 7, 8 require registration
  • Reference 10 is a permanent dead link and points to https://prisonfinder.org/virginia/county-jail/loudoun-county-adult-detention-center on Prison Finder.
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • It is hard ascertain the relevance of this conference centre as so many references are out of date, information is out of date;
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  • Page created 15 July 2008
  • Page has 133 edits by 56 editors
  • 90 day pageviews = 1,102 with a daily average of 11 views
  • Inspection of page history shows gradual improvement upto 2016; then the bots take over. 10 of them.
  • Page considered stable, no edit warring observed.
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  • File:NCC-highres.png = is in the public domain in the United States because it only contains materials that originally came from the United States Geological Survey
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_National_Conference_Center#/map/0 = Wikimedia maps
  • File:National Conference Center; interior view.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
  • All images have proper permissions and are appropriately tagged
  1. Notifying Editors:
  • Page Creator = MBisanz
  • Editor NCCmeet blocked 3 November 2010
  • Editor Mojo Hand
  • A total of two editors were able to be notified; remainder have 1 or 2 editors and not considered to be significant contributors to the article.

  1. Overall:
  • This page has not been updated since 2014 and information about the new operators of this centre is lacking. References are either primary or dead links. --Whiteguru (talk) 05:16, 15 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no opposition or improvements made; Matters raised in the reassessment were not addressed. These matters will remain valid until the next GA Review, whereupon they must be addressed first. --Whiteguru (talk) 01:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply