Talk:The Monkey Suit/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Ebe123 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ebe123 (talk · contribs) 11:12, 17 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    A couple words to watch for, but used well
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
    There is the plot, with no references, but put into a way that's not OR
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Prose

edit

Plot

edit
  • In "Ned walks off sadly, but Lisa explains that she respects and admire his beliefs, but feels that science and religion should never mix together and that Ned would not agree to evolution being taught in churches, a point upon which Ned agrees." the sentence is useless.

Other

edit