Talk:The Kiss (Munch)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Viriditas (talk · contribs) 19:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: per the article talk page, nominator is not a contributor to this article. Viriditas (talk) 19:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Criteria

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:

   Best practice is to cite and attribute quotes directly after the quote, not necessarily at the end of the paragraph. Viriditas (talk) 23:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

   Fixed. Viriditas (talk) 00:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Basic copyedits. Amazing images. Good to go. Viriditas (talk) 00:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks for taking this up. I'll be replying to any comments. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:56, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
  • It's done now. Viriditas (talk) 00:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
    • Oh. I'd have gotten that after work. Thanks. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2015 (UTC)