Talk:The Girls of the Ghetto/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Jaguar in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 17:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


Sorry for all the annoying notifications the GA bot is giving you... JAGUAR  17:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    I would recommend splitting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced, per WP:LEAD
    Nothing on the Production in the lead?
    The Cast section is unique for these 1910 films. It's also very short, if you want to ever take this further I would recommend merging it into prose
    " but the "Thanhouser Kid" Marie Eline and Anna Rosemond are known credits" - should that be "Tanhouser Kids"?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

If anyone thinks I'm rubber stamping these, I'm not. These are well researched GAs taking in account it's over 100 years old JAGUAR  19:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)Reply