Talk:The Fuccons/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Some Dude From North Carolina in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:15, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:15, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit
  • Add a non-free use rationale to the image.
  • Runtime needs a reference (per the template).
  • Other genres also need a source (per the template).
  • Add a link to the episode list with the "| list_episodes =" parameter.
  • "late night" → "late-night"
  • Remove the commas after "Wah! Mikey Returns" and "Oh! Mikey Fever".
  • "four more series, including the 2007 theatrical film Oh! Mikey Fever was released direct-to-DVD." → "four more series and the 2007 theatrical film Oh! Mikey Fever were released direct-to-DVD."
  • "news of the series were" → "news of the series was"

Overview

edit
  • "at real-time" → "in real-time"
  • "includes surreal" → "include surreal"
  • "a non-continuous storylines" → "a non-continuous storyline" or "non-continuous storylines"

Characters

edit

Production

edit
  • "hair stylist" → "hairstylist"
  • "late night" → "late-night"
  • "in the 54th" → "at the 54th"
  • Add commas after "January 24, 2004", "December 3, 2010", and "December 20, 2005".
  • "Afterwards" → "Afterward"
  • "at 28th Hong" → "at the 28th Hong"
  • "preview to" → "preview of"
  • "vols. 1-3 were released" → "vols. 1-3 was released"

Episodes and films

edit
  • Both of these sections look good.

Legacy

edit

Reception

edit
  • Add a subsection under the header titled "Critical response", and make #Awards_and_accolades a subsection under that.
  • "received mixed reception" → "received a mixed reception" or "received mixed responses"
  • Remove the comma after "cross-cultural commentary".
  • as "wacky weird ride" → as a "wacky weird ride"
  • For the awards table, add a references column with centered citations (example).

References

edit
In general, all of them, but my other suggestions have been addressed, so I'll be passing the article. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Progress

edit
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·