Talk:The End of an Error

Sourcing.

Please don't put back unsourced info that's been challenged 3 times now: [1], [2], [3]. "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged should be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation." - WP:BURDEN.

Also, if this subject is notable can someone please find reliable published third party sources to replace the current 3? -- Jeandré, 2008-10-19t23:11z

• If you do indeed read WP:MUSIC, you'll find that it says that "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." I have already provided links to NEWS stories from both AP Magazine and Absolutepunk, two generally notable music news sources. The Absolutepunk sources are not self-published, they are postings from the site's staff. Likewise, the tracklisting is not something that generally needs sourcing, even though I have done it twice. The album's tracklisting is freely available from most any source of that kind of information, including Allmusic and the iTunes music store. The article is a stub, and is tagged as such. Please stop reverting my edits, as your continued insistence on doing so, even after I have posted several times on your talk page, is unconstructive. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 23:19, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't know these sources and have asked about them at rs/n. As for the removals, I only did that while there were absolutely no inline sources, per WP:BURDEN. -- Jeandré, 2008-10-20t00:04z