Talk:The Edukators/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Delldot (talk · contribs) 21:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

This article is well written, well-cited and, it seems to me, comprehensive. The images check out. I can't see any reason not to pass it as is (incredibly rare for me, usually I'm a bastard reviewer). I do have a couple suggestions, you can work on it as you see fit in your own time.

• The two sections at the end are very short. Ideally you'd flesh out the prose or incorporate the info somewhere else in the article (and IIRC no see also section is better). If it would be possible to expand the impact section that would be great.

• This sentence is awkward: Weingartner said he received an offer for "which I would not have to work for the rest of my life" from an American studio

• This sentence is awkward: In the film's home countries it grossed $4,540,541 and $479,678 in Germany and Austria, respectively.

• To really go above and beyond, you could crop the images in that table so all the faces are the same size.

• You should mention in the lead that not all the critical reception was universally positive.

Great work! delldot ∇. 21:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Hey, delldot, many thanks for the review! I've applied (or at least tried to apply) your suggestions. The exception is the fourth one because... well, it may seem awkward but I didn't get it. Can you take a look at my edit and do the fourth suggestion? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 00:51, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Great work! I just meant that the actors' faces in the table show up as being different sizes, and that could be changed by uploading cropped versions of the pictures. e.g. the first image contains more background so her face appears smaller when the pictures are the same size. If you cropped the photo to have less background, her face would appear the same size as the others in the table. But don't worry about that, it's really picky. delldot ∇. 01:40, 15 May 2015 (UTC)