Talk:The Danish Girl (film)/Archive 1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Dkspartan1835 in topic Pseudo?
Archive 1

Has Alfredson really dropped out

There is that Swedish nespaper link but the international press doesn't seem to have picked up on the story. So perhaps it is incorrect, espcecially as it has been quite a few days now and the english press still hasn't reported it. Teatreez (talk) 18:56, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

It is true that he left, according to Kidman "it is very sad, since he is a very gifted filmmaker."[1][2] That said, newer reports speculate that he may re-join the project after all.[3] He can't seem to make up his mind. decltype (talk) 21:50, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
I readded it sourced to two Swedish broadsheet newspapers, which should be as reliable as any English broadsheets. And it's not just speculation that he might rejoin, Alfredson directly said that. Siawase (talk) 23:20, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
I know, "speculate" was poor wording on my part. decltype (talk) 23:21, 19 December 2009 (UTC)


Pseudo?

I realise this film has historical inaccuracies related to the life of Lili Elbe, but this is the case with pretty much every film to one extent or another, so is it really necessary to call it a pseudo-biographical film? It's really a biographical drama film. I'll change it back to that, and if there are objections please could we discuss it? Thanks Willowandglass (talk) 02:34, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

I removed the section. This is not a documentary film. Dramatic licensing will be involved. If the accuracy causes controversy and is widely reported, then it should go in. Just listing the differences because they are different is not standard practice. Dkspartan1835 (talk) 01:53, 7 January 2017 (UTC)