Talk:The Computer Wore Menace Shoes/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 15:11, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	No problems.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	!
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	!
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	!
	2c. it contains no original research.	!
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Yes.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Yes.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Yes.
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	There is one image. Could there possible be more? If you don't have time, don't worry, it's not necessary.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Yes!
	7. Overall assessment.	Amazing article. I also love this episode!!

HOLD Issues outlined need to be addressed before the article is accepted.

I removed the word "strange". As for the other Plot issues:

Plot summaries do not normally require citations; the television show itself is the source, as the accuracy of the plot description can be verified by watching the episode in question. An exception to this rule may be shows containing plot details that are unclear or open to interpretation, in which case the different interpretations should be sourced to reliable sources. (from WP:TVPLOT)

Thanks for the review! :) Queenieacoustic (talk) 10:50, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Trivia

Removed the following:

--cut here--

Because the couch gag was accidentally commissioned without his approval, the animators had to apologize to showrunner Scully, however he was pleased with it and ordered the animators to "go with it". At one point in the episode, Homer wins a Pulitzer Prize for his achievements in journalism. According to Kirkland, none of the animators knew what the prize looked like and had to do some research in order to make it accurate.

--end--

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 06:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC).