Talk:The Boat Race 1935/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 13:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Messrs Bourne (twice), Payne and Evans are given false titles, but I have bored you on that topic elsewhere, and it's entirely up to you. The OED doesn't hyphenate "outperform", and in the Race section you link both Times and Guardian a second time each, and tell us for the second time that Evans was writing in the latter. Nothing to frighten the horses there, and accordingly:

Review summary

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I'll look at another on the list later today if time permits. – Tim riley talk 13:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)