Talk:The Bacon Cookbook/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hadger 18:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

I read this article, and it is a very good article.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   This article definitely is prose and follows the manual of style, and I hardly found any grammar errors. Good job!

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   This article has reliable and verifiable sources, good references, and no original research. Good job!

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   This article covers important topics about the book and doesn't get off-topic. Good job!

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   This article contains no opinions but instead contains facts about opinions, doesn't contain words to avoid, and follows the rest of the neutral point of view policy. Good job!

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   I checked the history and saw that there are no edit wars or any other types of conflict that would harm the article. Good job!

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Although there is only one image, it is used in a good place. Good job!

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Congratulations! This article passed as a Good Article. Good job! --Hadger 18:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! Cirt (talk) 22:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)