 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
Mindys12345
editYour reversion caught me in the middle of changes that I think would have improved the page. This page is disorganized and needs some simple work, like putting all the sentences about each sub-topic together instead of having them scattered around.
Is there any particular reason you're opposed to that? Or to having the sources properly linked instead of saying "(Reference: http://www.leader-values.com/Content/detail.asp?ContentDetailID=1004)"? I'm assuming that you actually looked at all of the changes you reverted before you did so... WhatamIdoing 05:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Here's
editHere's a possible origin for the word "team". I'm not sure if it's the right origin but "team" can be an abreviation for "Together Everyone Achieves More". I saw it on a poster in one of my high school classrooms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.66.172 (talk) 20:33, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Etymology
editDoes TEAM really come from "Together Each Achieves More" (as in synergy)? I heard this is what it means. If it's true maybe it should be one of the first lines of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.97.200.25 (talk) 19:57, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- No. It's just an advertising slogan. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:58, 25 October 2008 (UTC)