Talk:Tatts Group

	Australia portal Tatts Group is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Gambling B‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

B

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Unsubstantiated Point of View edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the 'controversy' section, it includes a number of unverifiable, unsubstantiated assertions such as "gambling has become a problem in both these states." If there's no verification of such statements they should be removed. Aujoz (talk) 04:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to propose the merger of Tote Tasmania into this article. The company is long defunct, purchased and merged with Tatts, and it wasn't a hugely important company in its day anyway. I can find little in the way of good resources on anything but its sale. JT_dale^Talk~ 05:05, 6 February 2015 (UTC) --The following reference [here|http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/tatts-buys-tote-tasmania/story-fn91vdzj-1226211735773] gives details of the purchase by Tatts. Tote now UBet has a high profile in Tasmania at race courses and pubs, so my opinion is relevant. --TinTin (talk) 04:02, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merge completed; UBet is discussed and linked from the Tatts page. Klbrain (talk) 17:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tatts Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic