Talk:T-box transcription factor T

Latest comment: 4 years ago by JoergenB in topic Clarification(?)
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brachyury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply


moved out of unassessed on the genetics project

edit

1/15/17 DennisPietras (talk) 03:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

not present in all bilaterians

edit

07/17/19 I think that planarians do not have a known homolog for Brachyury despite being well studied. Perhaps the language should be changed to "most" or something similar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.244.235.83 (talk) 22:19, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Clarification(?)

edit

@Smith609: Ten years ago you asked for a clarification of a rather incomplete sentence. That sentence was cut short in this edit. I now tried to make it a bit clearer by restoring a bit of the origin. Is this sufficient for removing your {{cn}}, in your opinion? JoergenB (talk) 18:48, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply