Talk:Sweets and Sour Marge/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 20:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• Wikilink thirteenth season in lead
• "The idea for the episode was pitched by Omine, who based on a lawsuit at the time, wherein smokers sued tobacco companies for selling harmful wares." I think there's a word missing
• Unitalicize Motherloving Sweets and Sugar Company, and add quotation marks
• Make sure sentences with quotes end with citations (like "According to Omine, the list "never ended," and when the writers ..." etc)
• "At one point in the episode, the Springfield residents try to set the record or largest human pyramid, which fails when the pyramid collapses, causing the people to roll into a giant ball." I think a word is missing
• "Despite the risk of redundancy, "Sweets" actually works..." Should be 'Sweets'
• Decap refs 4, 6 and 11

On hold for seven days. Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 21:13, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks again for the review! Queenieacoustic (talk) 10:28, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Looks great. Pass for GA. Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 16:29, 30 July 2011 (UTC)