Talk:Svalbard and Jan Mayen/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 15:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I made one minor copy-edit.[2]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All references appear reliable and check out.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Thorough, broad and focussed.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   On image used, tagged and captioned

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Fine, I find no problems with this artcile. Happy to pass as GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to review the article :) Arsenikk ^(talk) 15:44, 7 November 2010 (UTC)