This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats articles
This redirect falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Fixed. An admin now needs to check The Independent pre-1994 archive to see that is what Duff Hart-Davis Wrote.- Adam37Talk 19:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
A daybook is usually cited as "number of entries/pages", an entry meaning pages. Not meaning discrete reports. This appears to have led to the Independent article which covers several other "fringe accounts" mis-understanding the number of reports. Just my opinion and more than a little learning, may I add.- Adam37Talk 19:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
