Talk:Superficiality

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Superficiality article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Mid‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

untitled edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Urban dictionary citation [3] is questionable. 138.87.161.48 (talk) 21:12, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

elementary grammar edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A phrase can be a sentence when it is in answer to a posed question, but the deleted sentence was just a dangling dingleberry. 98.4.112.204 (talk) 23:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic