Talk:SummerSlam (1990)/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Miyagawa in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll be the reviewer for this one - should be interesting as this was the PPV that got me into wrestling as a kid (although it was off a recording made by my cousin). Always liked Summerslam as it often fell onto my birthday. Anyway, I've had a look through and couldn't see anything major, but I'll give it a thorough read though now for grammar etc.
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 13:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Everything checks out, you can tell you've done this a few times! :) Miyagawa (talk) 14:22, 18 December 2010 (UTC)