Talk:SummerSlam (1990)/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Miyagawa in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I'll be the reviewer for this one - should be interesting as this was the PPV that got me into wrestling as a kid (although it was off a recording made by my cousin). Always liked Summerslam as it often fell onto my birthday. Anyway, I've had a look through and couldn't see anything major, but I'll give it a thorough read though now for grammar etc.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 13:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Everything checks out, you can tell you've done this a few times! :) Miyagawa (talk) 14:22, 18 December 2010 (UTC)Reply