Talk:Sugarelly

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Commons fair use upload bot in topic Fair use candidate from Commons: File:Soft Drink.svg

The Google test for "sugarelly" returns only 635 results, including this article and various mirrors and forks of Wikipedia. This might make it seem somewhat non-notable, but since this is a historical invention, its presence on the Internet is naturally going to be quite small. The fact that it has been the subject of an Oor Wullie cartoon is a testament to how well known it would have to have been at the time.--HisSpaceResearch 20:41, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Also, WikiProject countering systematic bias should take a warmer view towards the inclusion of this article, given that it isn't part of 21st century life in a developed country.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 15:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Shouldn't it be spelt sugarellie?
84.135.218.182 08:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Seeing that it appears to be more commonly known as liquorice water, mightn't it be prudent to label the article as "Liquorice Water" and have sugarelly or sugarellie as redirects? 86.13.119.97 (talk) 12:03, 8 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fair use candidate from Commons: File:Soft Drink.svg edit

The file File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:20, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fair use candidate from Commons: File:Soft Drink.svg edit

The file File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply