Talk:Students for Life of America
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to abortion, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Students for Life of America article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education assignment: Writing 101-The Archive edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 January 2023 and 26 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Apple063 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Flyer2004.
— Assignment last updated by Docscharn (talk) 21:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Hawkins edit
I’ve infiltrated DOC Robert Hawkins study group. Please advise- think I’m loosing my mind. Kristi, did you ever feel that way? 2600:1702:5280:DC10:A802:8199:49D2:1CCB (talk) 08:35, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Expanding the article edit
Hello fellow contributors, I've introduced a new section in the article titled "Views and Philosophy." This section aims to offer readers a more nuanced understanding of SFLA's perspectives by including their self-stated views. I am in the process of writing about their positions on specific issues based on their own statements. This addition, I believe, will contribute to a more comprehensive and first-person understanding of the organization's philosophy.
Additionally, I recently made edits to the introduction section, specifically addressing the mention of legal issues faced by SFLA. In the original sentence, it could be interpreted as if the organization has a supernatural ability to navigate legal issues frequently. To ensure a more accurate and neutral representation, I modified the sentence to read "SFLA has been involved in some legal litigations." This phrasing avoids the implication of routine involvement in legal matters. Additionally, I would like to open a discussion on whether the introduction needs to include details about legal issues at all, as there is already an extensive section covering a specific legal matter. I believe this adjustment enhances the overall neutrality and clarity of the article. I welcome your thoughts and feedback on this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TragicPower (talk • contribs) 03:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)