Talk:Strut (typesetting)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Question
editTeX offers \strut. Why the complicated \rule command in this case? --Mojca Miklavec
- As I recall, the
\strutcommand inserts a strut of a specific size tailored to the current font size. The\rulecommand is considerably more versatile, since you can set it to whatever size you need. (Of course,\strutis still useful because it 'does' adapt automatically to the current font size.) Steuard (talk) 06:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Why not have both
\strutand\ruleand point out that the first is the font size specific one and the other can be used for general struts? --Martin Scharrer (talk) 16:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Minimum depth
editThe current text says "used to ensure that a section has a minimum height". Beside the questionable term "section", the strut should also ensure a minimal depth (the vertical distance below the baseline, height is the distance above the baseline), right? --Martin Scharrer (talk) 16:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
I was looking for
edit\strut
the actual latex command. this page did not help me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.154.59.122 (talk) 15:36, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Real world strut.
editAn image of pre-electronic strut would be good too.
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Strut (typesetting) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | It is requested that an image or images of one or more symbols or characters be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
Images and diagrams may explain this term, which otherwise is difficult to understand. --DThomsen8 (talk) 19:31, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
"Typography" or just TeX?
editI thought this term was specific to TeX, and the article has no non-TeX citations. Does this term or even this concept exist in "typography" in general, or is it really just a TeX thing? If it is just a TeX thing, is it sufficiently notable to warrant an article here? 188.182.238.181 (talk) 01:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)