Talk:Stirchley, Shropshire

Shropshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shropshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Shropshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShropshireWikipedia:WikiProject ShropshireTemplate:WikiProject ShropshireShropshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

West Midlands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Possibly incorrect statement (under Growth of settlement) edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Also, 'the property was [sic] divided among a few' suggesting many people shared houses.

This quotes John Marius Wilson's gazetteer of 1870-72 but I query the correctness of interpretation of the quoted statement. At that time land ownership was factor mentioned in gazetteers and I would have interpreted 'the property is divided among a few' as meaning that the housing then existing was in the hands of a smaller than usual number of land/home owners. Do many agree? (Multiple occupancy was commonplace in industrialising villages and towns, that I do not question.)Cloptonson (talk) 09:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic