Talk:Still Human (2022 film)
(Redirected from Talk:Still Human (film))
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Mushy Yank in topic Notability
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Donaldd23 (talk · contribs) on 5 November 2023. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notability
editHello@Sirdog:. You restored on Nov 12 the notability tag you had put on the page on Nov 5 and that I had removed when adding sources, your e.s. was "restoring notability template as only 1 non-GNG compliant source was added since Nov 5". I am not sure what you mean. I've added 2 reviews and one source to back one of the claim of awards. How does this make only 1? I agree the Imdb sources on the Awards section are not enough and would rather remove the tag and clean up the section. Would you mind removing the notability tag then? Best,-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for reaching out, Mushy Yank. My edit summary meant to explain that on Nov 5 you contested the PROD and removed the notability template stating you would add more sources. After a week only 1 was added, and it was not GNG complaint. So I think the notability template still applies. The 2 reviews were added by Djangotata in August at page creation, not by you, and I don't think they satisfy NFILM criterion 1 (or GNG when combined) nor do I think the awards meet criterion 3.
- Before trying to clean up the article further, have you been able to find more sources online to support this film's notability? —Sirdog (talk) 23:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Fair, my apologies to you (I thought you had missed the 2 reviews, to be honest) and Djangotata, as I completely had forgotten I was not the one who added the links to the articles. My only excuse is I did not add the source but I added the text to go with them and that identifies them as reviews, I think [[1]]. There is a strong working consensus that 2 reliable reviews are enough to attest notability of films. And no, I did not search for further sources, or did not find them, I've forgotten that too! The film looks notable enough to me and seems to meet the WP criteria for film. But I understand that you do think it doesn't. Maybe other users have thoughts about this. I probably won't edit the page any further in the meantime. Thank you for your reply and again, apologies for the misunderstanding. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)