Talk:Stavros Niarchos Foundation Library/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by GhostRiver in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 13:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply


You know the drill by now, I'll be taking a look at this, and any section I mark with a   Working tag means I have more comments to make, but feel free to start working on the ones you do see.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Lede

edit

Description

edit
  • WL circulating library
  • "The building had been designed by T. Joseph Bartley." → "T. Joseph Bartley designed the building."
    • If there's a year for that design, it'd be nice to include
      • I did rephrase the sentence. I feel like adding the year is redundant, since the article already mentions that the site was acquired in 1914 and the store opened the next year. Like most buildings, the Arnold Constable store was designed between these two dates (i.e. design didn't start before the site was acquired). Epicgenius (talk) 18:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "The library is located diagonally across from..."

Facade

edit

Interior

edit

History

edit

Founding

edit

Expansion

edit

21st-century renovation

edit

References

edit
  • Good

General comments

edit
  • All images are Creative Commons and are relevant to the article
  • As an aesthetic aside, some may benefit from being left-aligned, especially towards the bottom
  • No evidence of edit warring or other content disputes in the revision history
  • Earwig score sits at 23.1%, the top result is a little sketchy. The NYT one sitting at 21.3% is entirely due to proper nouns and an attributed direct quote.

Hope you're staying safe with all the mid-Atlantic flooding! Putting on hold, but feel free to take your time and to ping me with any questions. — GhostRiver 17:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@GhostRiver: Thanks for the review, I really appreciate it. I didn't get hit as badly as others in the city, fortunately - I hope you're doing fine as well, since I heard there was also major flooding across the Northeast. I've resolved all of these issues now. Epicgenius (talk) 18:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Epicgenius Looks good now, thanks for doing that so quickly! As for me, my teaching assignment and my grad courses both went virtual. I'm far enough away from the Schuylkill not to be too terribly affected, but if you haven't seen the pictures of the Vine Street Expressway Canal, they're a real doozy. — GhostRiver 19:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.