Talk:Statue of Harvey W. Scott/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Vami IV in topic GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 09:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


Opening statement

edit

Hello, and come what may from this review, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. During the review, I may make copyedits, which I will limit to spelling correction and minor changes to punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. The Nominator(s) should understand that I am a grammar pedant, and I will nitpick in the interest of prose quality. For responding to my comments, please use  Done,  Fixed, plus Added,  Not done,  Doing..., or minus Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 09:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Prose

edit

Referencing

edit
  • There are connection errors for citations [8], [9], [18], and [38]. [11] apparently also has an error in its URL. See the "External link" tool for details.
  • The memorial is installed in Mount Tabor Park, a city park on Mount Tabor, a dormant volcano in southeast Portland's eponymous neighborhood. No citation present.

GA progress

edit

Article passes CopyVio scanner. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 09:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Pictures are free/tagged and relevant to the article. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 09:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

There are no disambiguation links present on the article. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 09:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

References are reliable. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 09:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.