Talk:Statically indeterminate
 | This article was nominated for merging with Statical determinacy on 1 September 2014. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was merge. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the Statical determinacy page were merged into Statically indeterminate on 17 November 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Static indeterminacy section edit
The section refers to a figure (a) and a figure (b), but neither are shown. Was this just copied straight out of a textbook without regarding whether it referred to any figures?69.74.217.37 (talk) 16:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
merge with edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
statical determinacy--137.205.174.41 (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed. This has been outstanding for over four years now.--عبد المؤمن (talk) 20:29, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- Agree. Statical determinacy is an expression I haven't heard before. It should be made a redirect to this article. Dolphin (t) 11:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Agree. Why hasn't this been done yet? Statical determinacy should redirect here. --Lead holder (talk) 11:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Connect with theory edit
This article really should refer to some methods for determining/approximating the reaction moments and forces of statically indeterminate beams/ beam systems. Such as decomposition into elementary cases, and theoretical foundations like the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation.
I must admit that I am not steady enough in these things to have a clue what to include and what not to include. Maybe there should be an example derivation in this article too.
I also agree that this article should be merged with the corresponding article for Statically determinate. They need each other as background, really, so maybe the distinction should me made within the article instead. Besides, they both are short and thin articles that need some more flesh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.44.138.159 (talk) 06:31, 6 August 2017 (UTC)