Talk:Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Simonwright in topic Unedited content on page

Temazepam as an S8?

edit

As far as I am aware, temazepam is an S4D drug, certainly not S8 in the same league as flunitrazepam. Abuse was curbed by withdrawing gelcaps from the market and applying stricter controls on PBS supply. Can someone verify/rectify this? Thanks. 58.165.100.62 (talk) 11:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

In NSW, temazepam is definitely S4D. I'm not sure about the other states. There are differences between states in scheduling. I think large packs of Nurofen Plus is S3 in Victoria and S2 in NSW. There is going to be some confusion if people from different states edit this page - probably need to do something about this.--Cidofovir9017 (talk) 07:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Temazepam is S4 as shown here. I've reverted again. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 23:57, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Australia vs World

edit

This page should be renamed or some other step should be taken to make it clear that this is a summary of Australian standards. It is not immediately clear in the page title or heading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.131.50.41 (talk) 15:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tasmania

edit

Tasmania is omitted, and has an S4D schedule also 131.217.6.7 (talk) 06:09, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Unedited content on page

edit

This diff shows some edits that have been made to this article which need to be cleaned up. Simon Wright (talk) 23:33, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

S100 HSD

edit

The article is missing a section on Schedule 100 Highly Specialised Drugs eg HIV antivirals, opiate substitution program etc. Someone ought to write one. D.R. du Prie 10:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duprie37 (talkcontribs)