Talk:Speedcubing

Inclusion of ZZ as one of the primary methods

Hey, ZZ isn't really used much competitively anymore, and is considered suboptimal, much like petrus, should we cite CFOP and Roux as the primary methods> CookingWithNitroglycerin (talk) 16:57, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Technical Writing

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 October 2023 and 1 November 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Brayzn (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jazaam02 (talk) 19:28, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Bum

I got a new world record 2.98 sexond I’m 7 82.16.188.39 (talk) 19:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Yiheng Wang 2x2 Average Ruling

https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/incidents/98

The WCA has ruled that Yiheng Wang’s recent 2x2 average does not stand due to him not requesting an extra attempt until after he finished the relevant solve and got a time. (Judge lifted cover early) 2600:1014:B1EE:336A:3495:96BF:50AE:C17F (talk) 20:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

ZZ incorrectly listed as "out of favour"

The current article states (without sources) that the ZZ method is "unfavourable" and "sub-optimal," however, the ZZ method is not only being actively used, it has been developed beyond EOline, and now uses EOCross -> ZZF2L -> ZBLL. Who decided it was abandoned? Why are there no citations? Why describe an old version of ZZ? Vfluorine (talk) 05:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Tsito

eux ml dix @ 41.77.16.153 (talk) 19:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)