Talk:Spectralon

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Zaereth in topic Trademark R?
WikiProject iconPolymers (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Application section edit

The last sentence in the application section seems a bit overly specialized for the average reader. If anyone knows about this particular use, I'd like to find a way to explain it further. Zaereth (talk) 00:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

General thing edit

Is spectralon not just plain old teflon anyways? Why is that not mentioned in the text? Instead we talk of a "fluoropolymer", an "extremely hydrophobic", its "chemical inertness" a.s.o., I mean that is fine, but let's also name what it actually is.

If my understanding is correct, not exactly. Like Spectralon, Teflon is a brand name. Both are fluoropolymers, but not exactly the same. There are also other fluoropolymers, such as Tefzel, Kynar, and Fluron. Zaereth (talk) 18:52, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


I thought spectralon is predominantly used as a reference standard for various spectroscopies. Would it not make sense to present an image of the UV-vis or IR spectrum of the material? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.211.160.42 (talk) 22:45, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Trademark R? edit

Is there some special reason the (R) is listed beside Spectralon all over this page? From the Wikipedia manual of style: "Do not use the ™ and ® symbols, or similar, in either article text or citations, unless unavoidably necessary for context (for instance, to distinguish between generic and brand names for drugs)." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.82.27.143 (talk) 22:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure why. The symbol was added by Gamckee on Feb 12, with no edit summary. However, Gamckee made several additions to the article to clarify that it is a Labsphere product. User Labsphere made the next edit, with the edit summary: "Clarifying that the subject is a registered trademark and not a generic descriptor." I would probably take this as a request by the manufacturer to prevent their product from becoming a generic name. (What wiki-policy says on the matter, I don't know. Personally, I have no problem with the R.) Zaereth (talk) 01:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply