Talk:Spectacled hare-wallaby

Mammals: Monotremes and Marsupials Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Monotremes and Marsupials (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Northern Territory / Queensland / Western Australia / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Spectacled hare-wallaby is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland, or the State Library of Western Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Threatened status

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I included some information on the barrow island subspecies - whose status is vunerable. Someone familiar with taxoboxes might know how, or if, this should be included there. Fred 20:12, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

is it still "near-threatened"?

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The statements "... the mainland subspecies was once regarded as a near-threatened status. The population of the species is in decline ..." are ambiguous. Is it still "near-threatened" but closer to threatened? Is it in another category? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 02:58, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic