Talk:Soviet cruiser Krasny Krym/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Bernstein2291 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bernstein2291 (Talk Contributions Sign Here) 02:49, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    What references does the second link in the Links section have?
    It wouldn't load for me, so I just deleted it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Is there any more information about its post WWII service?
    No, and that's what's annoying. Even Russian-language sources don't have squat about its post-war service.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Bernstein2291 (Talk Contributions Sign Here) 03:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Considering that it's a thorough as it's ever going to be, I'm going to pass it. Bernstein2291 (Talk Contributions Sign Here) 03:59, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply