Wikipedia

Talk:Southern Area Command (RAAF)/GA1

< Talk:Southern Area Command (RAAF)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Ian Rose in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 21:41, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply


Progression

edit
  • Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
  • Version of the article when review was closed: [2]

Technical review

edit
  • Citations: The Citation Check tool reveals no issues with reference consolidation (no action req'd).
  • Disambiguations: no dab links [3] (no action req'd).
  • Linkrot: no dead links [4] (no action req'd)
  • Alt text: images all have alt text [5] (no action req'd).
  • Copyright violations: The Earwig Tool reveals no issues with copyright violations or close paraphrasing (seems to be picking up combinations of proper nouns and common words which cannot be avoided) [6] (no action req'd).
  • Duplicate links: no duplicate links to be removed (no action req'd).

Criteria

edit
  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    • The article looks to be very well written to me and I couldn't find any issues with the prose.
      • Minor point: "...heavily engaged in anti-submarine patrols, seeking to locate this and any other U-boats in the area...", perhaps add that the search for U-862 was unsuccessful for completeness? (suggestion only - it is implied to the reader but you might spell it out)
    • No MOS issues I could see.
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    • The article is well referenced to WP:RS.
    • No issues with OR I could see.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    • The article is concise and doesn't go into unnecessary detail.
    • All major aspects of the topic seem to be sufficiently covered.
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
    • No issues I could see.
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
    • No issues here.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):   d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:  
    • Images seem to be free / PD and have the req'd information / templates.
    • Captions look fine.
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Southern_Area_Command_(RAAF)/GA1&oldid=673075937"