This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I think this article deserves better rating. It can doubtlessly be improved upon by a Nobel laureate but even the October 2010 version is a fine example of of depth, width and wit.
[removed duplicate WikiProject Poetry template] --Xover (talk) 08:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC) Sintermerte (talk) 16:38, 21 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Sintermerte:WikiProject Poetry has specific assessment criteria for A-Class. If you believe the current quality assessment is wrong you should probably follow the procedure outlined on the project's assessment page. Note particularly that re-assessment should be implemented by changing the |quality= parameter in the existing template, rather than by adding a new instance of the template with the altered rating. I've taken the liberty of removing the extraneous template invocation from your above comment as it was causing some technical issues. --Xover (talk) 08:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
